Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Black Americans still emotionally enslaved

With the impending confirmation battle of Supreme Court nominee Ruth Bader Sotomayor, the usual racist accusations will be flying from the MSM and the liberal cesspit towards Conservatives. Liberals and their lapdogs in the media have successfully labeled the Republican Party as racists for the past thirty years and continue to reap the rewards at election time. Former democratic political consultant Barbara Howard recently pointed out that the Democratic Party has revised history to show that Democrats, and not the Republicans, have been in the forefront of civil rights for black Americans. Anyone that is a student of history knows that the Democratic Party is the same party that created the segregationist Jim Crow Laws and was involved in the beatings and killing of civil rights workers in the 1950’s and 60’s.

Mrs. Howard asks why the civil rights old guard is silent today when even the most astute black American thinks it was the FBI under a Republican administration rather than J. Edgar Hoover under Democratic AG Robert F. Kennedy that wiretapped Dr. King. Few Americans remember that is was global-warming Al Gore’s father that opposed the civil rights act of 1964. Al Gore Sr., along with LBJ, was one of only three Democratic senators from 11 former confederate states that did not sign the Southern Manifesto opposing integration. The Democratic Party was never a friend of civil rights when it counted and no one seems to remember. That is the way the liberals and the media want you to remember ‘their’ history.

The media never points out the fact that black Americans are primarily Christian and “conservative,” even though they vote for the Democratic candidate 90% of the time. The same can be said with the Hispanics and their conservative and Christian values. Seventy (70%) percent of black Americans voted against gay marriage in California which didn’t get much media attention at the time. Black Americans are in favor of school vouchers which liberals oppose and once again are never reported by the MSM. Why do black Americans vote for a party that holds them back? The answer can be found in the revisionist history of the MSM and Democratic Party, but fault can also be attributed to the GOP.

How does the Republican Party pull black American voters to our movement? Good question and one we have been trying to figure out for some time now. We must unapologetically preach our values to the black community and try to dismiss the liberal propaganda that is fed to them. This is the challenge for our cause and we have an uphill battle. We have forty years of brainwashing to erase and that can be very difficult. If we can pull 20% of black Americans to our side, we and they can win every time. My question is how we change the status quo when the black community seems to be emotional slaves to the Democratic Party.

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, May 25, 2009

Obama's moment of truth-The future is watching

A day after North Korea has once again snubbed their nose at Obama and the international community, the world remains powerless. It appears that Kim Jong Ill has lit at least one nuke and launched an ICBM capable of reaching US territory. Under a six-party deal with the United States, China, Japan, South Korea and Russia in 2007, North Korea agreed to scrap its weapons-grade nuclear programs for energy aid. How many times are we going to give this piss-poor country energy in exchange for a worthless "agreement." I say it is time to take off the gloves and get serious with North Korea.

President Obama needs to put North Korea back on the state sponsor of terrorism list Tuesday morning and scrap all energy and food aid to the Korean peninsula immediately. Dictator Kim needs to know that any future launch of an ICBM will be knocked out of the air with our Aegis warships and any subsequent attack on South Korea will be met by an unrelenting counter air attack. Mr. Obama must know that the Iranians are watching our reaction to N. Korea and are taking notes. Keep in mind the cooperation between N. Korea and Iran and the data they share on nuclear matters.

Mr. Obama's weak comments on the subject will only encourage N. Korea and Iran in their pursuit of a fully operational nuclear arsenal. Israel is observing Obama and the international community response as well because their lives depend on a tough response.
The Obama Administration has put pressure on Israel to reign in any attack on Iran's nuclear complex in the hopes that Ahmadinjad will suddenly respond to reason. Iran will see the weak response from Obama and the UN as a green light to manufacture their nuclear tipped missiles with no consequence.

The North Korean situation will not only affect North East Asia but also the volatile Middle East region as well. Kim has already tried to spread his new found technology to Syria and is working with Iran to bolster their nuclear threat. It is time to take off the kid gloves in regards to N. Korea and allow Israel (with our assistance) a preemptive attack on Iran's nuclear complex.
Dictators and tyrants do not respect agreements-They only respect power. This is not a time for a paper tiger, Carter-esque foreign policy-It is a time for a "big stick" policy. Mr. Obama, this is your time to lead-The future is watching!

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, May 24, 2009

In the remembrance of those that sacrificed.

In normal times, I usually like to think of Memorial Day as being non-partisan and reflective in nature but unfortunately these are not normal times. Remembering the men and women that died to keep this country free and safe should not have political overtones but in today’s politically charged atmosphere, everything seems to be fair game. It appears to have started when the insurgency in Iraq picked up full steam and the liberal democrats began to undercut the war effort with an eye towards the 2004 Presidential elections.

There were many reasons that the Democratic Party abandoned our troops during a time of war. The far left was against the war from the beginning and has always believed America to be the problem and should not be the lone super power. The left of center democrats, for the most part, supported the war resolution in the beginning when it was politically popular to do so. When the war plans didn’t go as planned, the left of center (Murtha, Reid, Kerry and Clinton) that voted for the war resolution began a little CYA. With that kind of congressional leadership, World War II would have turned much different than what we celebrate today.

The amazing thing about liberal claims of “supporting the troops” but not the war are ridiculous on its face. Obama accused US forces of “air-raiding villages and killing civilians” and Congressman Murtha accused US Marines of "killing innocent civilians in cold blood.” Senator John Kerry started his bashing of the US military in 1971 when he declared, “the 200 thousand a year who are murdered by the United States of America.” Senator Durbin once compared US forces to “Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime — Pol Pot or others — that had no concern for human beings." I think our troops can do without this kind of strong support from our liberal democrats.

After the democratic takeover of our government, the attacks continue and the apologies are forth coming. Nancy Pelosi has recently accused the men and women that protect this country of willfully lying to the Congress of the United States. How can we trust the Speaker of the House and the third person in line to be president when she throws the CIA under the bus to save her own ass. This Memorial Day, I would like to remember the men and women that died in the service of their country. Because of their sacrifice, liberals can spout all the crazy anti-American vitriol that fills their hearts.

President Obama recently returned from his apology for America tour in the hopes of international acceptance and goodwill. Mr. Obama, I would like to remind you of the tremendous sacrifice of American lives that need no apologies. These Americans that died in the cause of freedom probably turned in their collective graves when you declared America as being “arrogant.”

The American Cemetery at Aisne-Marne, France. A total of 2289 of our military dead. The American Cemetery at Brittany, France. A total of 4410 of our military dead. Brookwood, England American Cemetery. A total of 468 of our dead. Cambridge, England. 3812 of our military dead. Epinal, France American Cemetery. A total of 5525 of our Military dead. Flanders Field, Belgium. A total of 368 of our military. Florence, Italy. A total of 4402 of our military dead. Henri-Chapelle, Belgium. A total of 7992 of our military dead. Lorraine, France. A total of 10,489 of our military dead. Luxembourg, A total of 5076 of our military dead. Meuse-Argonne. A total of 14246 of our military dead. Netherlands, A total of 8301 of our military dead. Normandy, France. A total of 9387 of our military dead. Oise-Aisne, France. A total of 6012 of our military dead. Rhone, France. A total of 861 of our military dead. Sicily, Italy. A total of 7861 of our military dead. Somme, France. A total of 1844 of our military dead. St. Mihiel, France. A total of 4153 of our military dead. Sureness, France. A total of 1541 of our military dead.

These soldiers would have never apologised for making the world safe against tyranny and fascism and they were certainly not arrogant. Thank you to all of the men and women in uniform and the intelligence community that make this world safe.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Nancy Pelosi continues her lies-Blames the CIA



Can you say, lying moron. This lady looks as guilty as a meth freak caught shooting up behind a crack house. The Speaker of the House is now resorting to calling the men and women of the CIA serial liars. The same men and women that keep this country safe from international terrorists. I would not be surprised if she calls another press conference tomorrow and accuses The United States Military of plots against her life. This pathetic drag queen is digging herself and her party a huge hole. Thanks Nancy, keep it up!

Sphere: Related Content

US funds study of Chinese prostitutes & Argentine gay men.

If you thought your tax monies were being wasted in Washington, wait till you hear how the National Institutes of Health is spending your money. Fox News is reporting that the NIH will spend $2.6 million to make sure that Chinese prostitutes drink less on the job. Yes, you read that right! Researchers will visit one hundred whore houses, seven hundred prostitutes and one hundred and fifty pimps and madams. According to Fox, the NIH wants to take "a cold hard look at why prostitutes engage in dangerous sex while drunk." I assume that by "dangerous sex" they mean unprotected sex and the Greek variety.

Do they really need to spend millions to figure out why whores drink and then have risque' sex? Have these researchers ever been to a night club while in college or a beach during spring break. Men figured out a long time ago that the more alcohol they can get the girl to drink the better chance they will get "lucky." When people are drunk, their inhibitions are lowered and they do things that otherwise they wouldn't do. The first prong of the Chinese intervention program involves "gatekeeper training," which means teaching pimps and madams to enhance the culture of safe sex in their brothels according to Fox News. This sounds like a sex class in our liberal public school system.

Federal researchers are spending more than $400,000 in taxpayer money to cruise gay bars in Argentina where gay meet, consume alcohol and have sex. Their goal, as stated by the NIH, is to study and understand the various factors that contribute to the creation of high risk sexual ineraction. Let me spell this out for the government researchers: You have a room full of gay men that are drinking cocktails (no pun intended) and these men like to have sex with other men. What the hell do you think is going to you think they are going to sit around at the bar and watch the Golden Girls on the plasma. I could have just saved the NIH and the taxpayers $3 million with common sense. Liberals will blow (no pun intended) money on anything and everything all in the name of "caring" and "understanding."

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, May 11, 2009

The Hamas 'peace' gambit

This is a must read for anyone that thinks that the two-state solution is the simple cure for Israeli-Palestinian peace. On paper, the two state solution sounds like a fair accommodation that would result in long lasting peace. If you take a look at recent history, it appears that may not be the case. This is from the Washington Post writers group posted on the Jerusalem Post website.


"Apart from the time restriction [a truce that lapses after 10 years] and the refusal to accept Israel's existence, Mr. Mashaal's terms approximate the Arab League peace plan..." - Hamas peace plan, as explained by The New York Times.

"Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?" - Tom Lehrer, satirist

The Times conducted a five-hour interview with Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal at his Damascus headquarters. Mirabile dictu, they're offering a peace plan with a two-state solution.

Except. The offer is not a peace but a truce that expires after 10 years.

Meaning that after Israel has fatally weakened itself by settling millions of hostile Arab refugees in its midst, and after a decade of Hamas arming itself within a Palestinian state that narrows Israel to eight miles wide - Hamas restarts the war against a country it remains pledged to eradicate.

There is a phrase for such a peace: the peace of the grave.

Westerners may be stupid, but Hamas is not. It sees the new American administration making overtures to Iran and Syria. It sees Europe, led by Britain, beginning to accept Hizbullah. It sees itself as next in line. And it knows what to do. Yasser Arafat wrote the playbook.

With the 1993 Oslo Accords, he showed what can be achieved with a fake peace treaty with Israel - universal diplomatic recognition, billions of dollars of aid and control of Gaza and the West Bank, which Arafat turned into an armed camp. In return for a signature, he created in the Palestinian territories the capacity to carry on the war against Israel that the Arab states had begun in 1948 but had given up after the bloody hell of the 1973 Yom Kippur War.

Mashaal sees the opportunity. Not only is the Obama administration reaching out to its erstwhile enemies in the region, but it begins its term by wagging an angry finger at Israel over the Netanyahu government's ostensible refusal to accept a two-state solution.

OF ALL THE PHONY fights to pick with Israel. No Israeli government would turn down a two-state solution in which the Palestinians accepted territorial compromise and genuine peace with a Jewish state. (And any government that did would be voted out in a day.) Binyamin Netanyahu's own defense minister, Ehud Barak, offered precisely such a deal in 2000. He even offered to divide Jerusalem and expel every Jew from every settlement remaining in the new Palestine.

The Palestinian response (for those who have forgotten) was: No. And no counteroffer. Instead, nine weeks later, Arafat unleashed a savage terror war that killed 1,000 Israelis.

Netanyahu is reluctant to agree to a Palestinian state before he knows what kind of state it will be. That elementary prudence should be shared by anyone who's been sentient the last three years. The Palestinians already have a state, an independent territory with not an Israeli settler or soldier living on it. It's called Gaza. And what is it? A terror base, Islamist in nature, Iranian-allied, militant and aggressive, that has fired more than 10,000 rockets and mortars at Israeli civilians.

If this is what a West Bank state is going to be, it would be madness for Israel or America or Jordan or Egypt or any other moderate Arab country to accept such a two-state solution. Which is why Netanyahu insists that the Palestinian Authority first build institutions - social, economic and military - to anchor a state that could actually carry out its responsibilities to keep the peace.

APART FROM BEING reasonable, Netanyahu's two-state skepticism is beside the point. His predecessor, Ehud Olmert, worshiped at the shrine of a two-state solution. He made endless offers of a two-state peace to the Palestinian Authority - and got nowhere.

Why? Because the Palestinians - going back to the UN partition resolution of 1947 - have never accepted the idea of living side by side with a Jewish state. Those like PA President Mahmoud Abbas, who might want to entertain such a solution, have no authority to do it. And those like Hamas's Mashaal, who have authority, have no intention of ever doing it.

Mashaal's gambit to dress up perpetual war as a two-state peace is yet another iteration of the Palestinian rejectionist tragedy. In its previous incarnation, Arafat lulled Israel and the Clinton administration with talk of peace while he methodically prepared his people for war.

Arafat waited seven years to tear up his phony peace. Mashaal's innovation? Ten - then blood.

Sphere: Related Content

The White House Correspondents Dinner and double standards.

I must admit that as I watched Wanda Sykes at the White House Correspondents Dinner, I did have a few chuckles with some of her jokes. The one about VP Biden giving classified information and torturing the terrorists just by the sound of his voice was a good one. Then there was the one about Obama and his nipples that was quite funny but then she crossed the line. Making fun of conservatives is fine until you start wishing death upon them and accusing them of being terrorists just because you disagree. The double standard that the media and this White House embraces is glaring.

Since Wanda Sykes has crossed that line with a no-holds-barred routine, I think I will try my hand in tasteless jokes with those I disagree. Mr. President, it is no wonder that your father left you and your mother when you were young, hell, look at your ears. Or maybe a little nastier-Since Ted Kennedy survived the wreck in which he killed Mary Jo Kopecne, I hope his brain cancer spreads to his rectum and kills him...slowly. And Barney Frank, man that guy is so gay, I hope he gets aids and a nasty case of fatal anal gonorrhea. I wonder if the President would have laughed it up after my routine. The media would have turned me and my family into public enemy number one and I would be destroyed.

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, May 8, 2009

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and Pandora's box

In President Obama’s zeal to placate the Soros wing of the Democratic Party is now coming back to bite them in the ass. The anti-America liberal wing has been pressuring the Obama Administration into a witch hunt of the Bush Administration since day one. Obama has acquiesced to their demands by allowing AG Holder to decide if charges are warranted for the alleged mass-torture by the Bush Administration. Former Vice-President Cheney’s call for the release of CIA memos that illustrate the success of the enhanced interrogation techniques was the first shot over the bow. It has now been proven that House Speaker Nance Pelosi lied about what she new and when she new it about the alleged torture of terrorists.

After initial denials, newly released documents prove that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was thoroughly briefed in September 2002 that CIA interrogators were water boarding terrorist Abu Zubaydah. Nancy Pelosi has lied about this knowledge from the very beginning and with good reason. If it were known that Pelosi signed off on the alleged torture, her liberal base would be outraged. The 10-page report, submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee and other Capitol Hill officials Wednesday, refutes in considerable detail Pelosi’s statement last month that she was never told about the use of water boarding or other special interrogation tactics. According to the report, Pelosi was told of the techniques used against Zubaydah during a Sept. 4, 2002, meeting with intelligence officials.

Pelosi has said repeatedly that she was told only that the Bush administration had legal opinions that would have supported the use of such techniques. But CIA leaders have maintained that Pelosi and other Democrats who have been protesting recently about the use of enhanced interrogation knew about it all along. This shows the sharp contrast of liberal hypocarcy and the lengths they will go to harm our national security just to damage to George W. Bush’s legacy. Everything is political with these people even if it harms our war on terror and national security. Political power is more important than victory over radical Islam.

I think you will see this issue buried without much fanfare and much to the liberal wings dismay. Bush-Derangement Syndrome is still prevalent in the Democratic Party even after the victory of the Messiah. Will Pelosi face repercussions from her base because of the newly released memos? The simple answer is no. Liberals care not for truth but only for power and they will do anything to advance their cause. I would welcome such a debate and the importance of EIT and the American lives that were saved because of it. Liberals will trade American lives to retain power and control of the government and that is just plain sick!

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Senator Specter has an appointment to keep in Samarra

After RINO Senator Arlen Specter bolted the GOP for his true home in the Democratic Party, Harry Reid has stripped him of his seniority on committee assignments. Specter claims that he and Reid had an agreement that would guarantee that his seniority would be retained. I take such delight in the fact that Arlen was double crossed after his hero welcome to his new party. The Democratic Party has been screwing Americans for years with their double speak and Arlen baby was not smart enough to see it happening to him. Harry Reid and the Democrats just showed their true colors and no one should be truly surprised.

Liberals in general are extremely loyal to their members and will defend them even against the most outrageous crimes and misdeeds. Harry Reid and Co. didn't really see Specter as one of their own, they just used him as a coup de grace against the Republican Party and if he caucuses with them, so much the better. Obama and others promised to campaign for Specter in the 2010 midterms, but I think you will see them go neutral and even back another Democrat in the primaries. Welcome Home Senator Specter! You are where you belong and you received everything that was coming to you. Arlen's predicament reminds me of an old epigraph.

A merchant in Baghdad sends his servant to the marketplace for provisions. Shortly, the servant (Specter) comes home white and trembling and tells him that in the marketplace he was jostled by a woman (GOP voters), whom he recognized as Death (defeat), and she made a threatening gesture. Borrowing the merchant's horse, he flees at top speed to Samarra (Dem Party), a distance of about 75 miles (125 km), where he believes Death (defeat) will not find him. The merchant then goes to the marketplace and finds Death, and asks why she made the threatening gesture. She replies, "That was not a threatening gesture, it was only a start of surprise. I was astonished to see him in Baghdad, for I had an appointment with him tonight in Samarra.

Mr. Specter, you have an appointment to keep in 2010.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Soviet expansionism underway in Georgia

Soviet expansion still appears to be apart of Russian foreign policy. It is being reported that Russia was behind or in collusion with coup plotters in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia. According to the Georgian Times, the Georgian Interior Ministry states Russia had planned to organize a military uprising in various military divisions of Georgia. This uprising was supposed to coincide with NATO military exercises that are scheduled for May 6. Russia denies any involvement in the coup attempt and says the charges are "crazy." Georgian government officials have released video of the coup plotter stating he will have the backing of five thousand Russian troops in support of the coup.

Russian denials seem dubious when you recall the threat from Prime Minister Putin during last summers brief war with Georgia. With Russian tanks only 30 miles from Tbilisi on August 12, French President Sarkozy told Mr. Putin that the world would not accept the overthrow of Georgia’s Government. Putin seemed unconcerned by international reaction and went on to say “I am going to hang Saakashvili by the balls.” The French leader thought he had misheard. “Hang him?” — he asked. “Why not?” Mr. Putin replied. “The Americans hanged Saddam Hussein.”

The Russians are outraged with Georgia's attempt to join NATO and appeared ready to sabotage those plans with a coup during the month long NATO training exercises. It seems that President Obama's recent apology tour did nothing to satisfy the Russians and their Soviet expansion plans. Vladimir Putin smells weakness from the Obama Administration and will do as he wishes, knowing that Obama will do nothing. There has been no comment or concern from the White House about the coup attempt of our strategic ally. You would think that the potential disruption of NATO military exercises by Russian troops might elicit a response from the leader of the free world. The world is still waiting Mr. President

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, May 2, 2009

Jack Kemp-July 13, 1935-May 2, 2009

July 13, 1935-May 2, 2009
Thank you for your service to the country.

A reader (MommyKoz) has referred a great article of Jack Kemp the man. Secretary Kemp was a patriot and will be missed.

Sphere: Related Content