Obama's support for the 'Occupy' movement is telling

Why would any voter support an American President that voiced support for the anti-capitalist, Jew hating, socialist loving Occupy movement?  Barack Obama even went so far as to say "you’re (Occupy Movement) the reason I ran for office in the first place.”  Many leaders in the Democratic Party have voiced support for these dregs and attacked the peaceful Tea Party protests that preceded the 'Occupy' movement.  

The 'Occupy' thugs plan on disrupting traffic and commerce on the East and West coasts to celebrate May Day (International Workers' Day) and what do we get from the White House?  We get an Obama speech that is filled with class warfare rhetoric.  In many ways the modern day Democratic Party is the Occupy movement.  The Democratic Party is filled with socialists that share a disdain for capitalism.  The Democratic Party is filled with people (The Black Panthers, Union thugs, Eco-nuts) that think violence is okay if it helps advance their cause.  

President Obama has mocked and attacked those that support the Tea Party.  What is the Tea Party?  The Tea Party is a group of patriotic Americans that want the government to practice fiscal responsibility and adhere to the Constitution of the United States.  The Tea Party is comprised of black, white, Hispanic, Asian and Jewish people that think they're taxed too much.  You didn't see rapes, murders and violence at their rallies like you do with the Occupy' movement.  It's very telling that Obama and other Democratic Party leaders support the Occupy movement while they ridicule the Tea Party.  Unless you're a card carrying member of the modern day Nationalist Socialist Democratic Party, your decision on who to vote for this November should be very simple.        

    

Sphere: Related Content

Racism vs Race-Baiting

The killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman is tragic indeed, but so are the countless other killings that happen everyday in our country.  There are people in our society that will seize upon this tragedy to advance their own cause and make the situation far worse than it needs to be.  The people I speak of are the same race-baiting whores we see time after time when something like this occurs.  Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and crazy Louis Farrakhan make a living on racism, whether that racism is real or imagined. 

The mainstream media and the other race-whores are calling the killing of Mr. Martin an act of overt racism.  The problem with this accusation is George Zimmerman is a Hispanic that grew up in a multiracial family.  Zimmerman has black American neighbors defending him telling the media that everything being reported was untrue and that she would trust George with her life.  Another black neighbor said that George was the only one, black or white, who came and welcomed her to the community, offering any assistance he could provide.  Of course those in the media don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story.  Reuters published a story today in which they called Zimmerman a “white” Hispanic.  Why do you think Reuters would go to the effort to label Zimmerman as a white Hispanic?  You and I both know the answer to this question and it’s a disgusting effort by ‘journalists’ to inflame the situation.  The media must create their own facts so it will fit their (white on black racism) narrative. 

Not to be outdone by the self proclaimed black leaders (Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakhan), the racist New Black Panther Party are doing all they can to foment fear and violence in Florida by offering a $10,000 bounty on the head of George Zimmerman.  The Black Panther leader, Mikhail Muhammad, has called for 10,000 black men willing to form a militia to find Mr. Zimmerman and administer what they regard as justice.  Asked if he was inciting violence, Mr. Muhammad stated, "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." To the sound of cheers from followers, who wore black uniforms, he promised: "If the government won't do the job, we'll do it."  President Obama has interjected himself into the controversy by saying, "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon” and that the nation needed to do some "soul searching" over the shooting death of an unarmed African-American teenager.  That’s all well and good, but I expect the President to try and calm the situation and he hasn’t done that as of yet.       

The point of my article is not to deny that racism exists or disavow that Black Americans are killed solely because of their race.  Black Americans are in fact killed because of their race, however, just not as much as the media and the race-whores would have you believe.  White Americans are killed by black people simply because they’re white, but of course it’s not reported as being overt racism perpetrated by Black Americans.  What I’m attempting to point out is the hypocrisy of those on the left who are trying to manufacture racism…facts be damned. 

I challenge these so called ‘civil rights’ leaders and groups to do something really brave.  Why don’t these people address the real crimes that are being committed against black youths every minute of every day?  What is that crime?  Black on black crime kills more black youths than all the racial based crimes combined in the history of our country.  The disturbing truth that continues to be swept under the rug is that Black American youths are killing themselves at highly disproportionate rates.  Homicide is the number one cause of death for Black American youth and young adults ages 10 to 24 and it’s not being committed by racist whites or racist white Hispanics.

I realize racism is a cottage industry for those in the civil rights movement, but if they really wanted to help their community they would address the real killers of their youth.  Black on black crime is not the only big killer of Black Americans.  While blacks make up only 13.6% of the U.S. population, they account for 50.3% of all diagnosed cases of HIV.  The rate of HIV diagnosis among black men is eight times that of whites and two times that of Hispanics, and the rate for black women is 19 times that of whites and four times that of Hispanics.  The black community is in dire need for real leadership, but unfortunately I don't see anyone stepping up to the plate.  All I see is self serving race-baiting whores and an accommodating media trying foment violence.
 __________________________________________________
INTERESTING ARTICLE-- Former NAACP leader C.L. Bryant is accusing Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton of “exploiting” the Trayvon Martin tragedy to “racially divide this country.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/former-naacp-leader-accuses-sharpton-and-jackson-of-exploiting-trayvon-martin/#ixzz1qHRf5jZ3

Sphere: Related Content

Is Texas Lt Gov. Dewhurst really a fiscal Conservative?

In the race to replace Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison we have heard many candidates claim to be fiscal, small government Conservatives.  Former Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert resigned his position about a year ago to make a run for Hutchison's seat and surprised many (even his own supporters) when he claimed to be a Conservative.  Lt. Governor Dewhurst has money and name recognition within the state, but is he really the fiscal, small government Conservative he claims to be?  The Ted Cruz campaign has released a new video showing just the opposite may be true.  Cruz, a former Texas state solicitor general, has a real record of being a staunch Conservative and has a long list of national Conservative leaders endorsing his candidacy.  When left-wing groups such as Thinkprogress.org label Cruz as "a radical attorney named Ted Cruz" you know he's doing something right.  During Lt Gov. Dewhurst's ten year reign the Texas Senate proposed $5.8 BILLION more in spending than the Texas House.  That is hardly the record of a fiscal, small government Conservative.

       

For more information about Ted Cruz and his campaign go HERE

Sphere: Related Content

Andrew Breitbart 1969-2012

                                     Andrew Breitbart

                                             1969-2012

                          

Sphere: Related Content

President Obama may be excluded from Georgia ballot

According to Congressman Tom Tancredo's website, President Obama may be excluded from the ballot in Georgia as a candidate for the election this November.  There was a lawsuit filed in Georgia against Mr. Obama in regards to his status as a "natural born citizen" and Obama's attorney, Michael Jablonski, decided not to show for the proceedings.  Mr. Jablonski declared that he will no longer participate in administrative court hearings on a challenge to Obama’s spot on Georgia’s presidential primary ballot.  The Georgia Secretary of State (Brian Kemp) responded to Obama’s attorney with the warning, “if you and your client (Obama) choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

     

The Judge in the case has said he will decide by Feb 5 whether or not he will recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State to exclude Obama from the ballot.  The Georgia Secretary of State has said he will follow the Judge's recommendation.  This ruling itself won’t really hurt Obama’s reelection efforts because Obama lost Georgia in 2008.  Georgia has 16 electoral votes up for grabs this election cycle and those will probably go to the GOP nominee with or without this ruling.  If the “Birthers” win this ruling in Georgia, it will no doubt inspire them to try this tactic in states that Obama needs to claim the 270 Electoral College votes to win the election.  This story is still developing so stay tuned!  

Court proceedings in PDF HERE   Georgia Sec of State letter to Obama's attorney HERE 

   

Jablonski letter to Secretary of State Kemp:

Hon. Brian P. Kemp

Georgia Secretary of State

214 State Capitol

Atlanta, Georgia 30334

via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.

Re: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Secretary Kemp:

This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia – that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.

Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate. Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.

For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.

It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.

Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs. One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country. Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.” She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records. She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011. Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.

In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….

As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda. She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.

All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok. He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them. Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority. See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975) [1]; Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).

The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued [2]. A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1). Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law. Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court), reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373. (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.

We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.

Very truly yours,

MICHAEL JABLONSKI

Georgia State Bar Number 385850

Attorney for President Barack Obama

cc: Hon. Michael Malihi

Van Irion, Esq.

Orly Taitz, Esq.

Mark Hatfield, Esq.

Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.

Stefan Ritter, Esq.

Ann Brumbaugh, Esq.

Darcy Coty, Esq.

Andrew B. Flake, Esq.

[1] We recognize that where the constitutional validity of a statute is challenged before an administrative hearing officer or board, such officer or board is powerless to declare the Act unconstitutional, and resolution of the constitutional question must await judicial review on appeal. Thus the making of such constitutional challenge before the hearing officer or board appears futile at the time of its making.

[2] 616-1-2-.17 Withdrawal of Hearing Request; Settlement. Amended.

(1) A party requesting a hearing may withdraw the request for hearing at any time, in writing or otherwise, whereupon the Administrative Law Judge may enter an order of dismissal with prejudice.

(2) The parties may agree to settle the matters in dispute at any time, whereupon the Administrative Law Judge shall enter an order of dismissal with prejudice.

Authority O.C.G.A. Sec. 50-13-40.

History. Original Rule entitled “Hearings for the Real Estate Appraisers Board” adopted as ER. 616-1-2-0.2-.17. F. Mar. 23, 1995; eff. Apr. 1, 1995, as specified by the Agency. Amended: Permanent Rule entitled “Withdrawal of Request for Hearing or Settlement” adopted.

F. June 30, 1995; eff. July 20, 1995. Amended: Rule retitled “Withdrawal of Request for Hearing; Settlement”. F. Dec. 12, 2003; eff. Jan. 1, 2004. Repealed: New Rule entitled “Withdrawal of Hearing Request; Settlement” adopted. F. Nov. 15, 2010; eff. Dec. 5, 2010.

 ______________________________________________________________________

****UPDATE*****

President Barack Obama’s name will remain on the Georgia primary ballot after a state law judge flatly rejected legal challenges that contend he can not be a candidate.  According to FOX NEWS 19, despite the fact that he didn't come to court, and his lawyer refused to defend the case, President Barack Obama has won a case brought by several so-called "birthers" who sought to have him removed from the Georgia ballot for re-election on grounds that he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States. STORY HERE 

Sphere: Related Content

Obama throws temper tantrum, cancels Austere Challenge 12 with Israel.

The Obama administration cancels the US-Israeli Austere Challenge 12 war-games that was scheduled to begin this Spring because of  disagreements with Israel.  Obama is said to be furious at Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Ya'alon when Ya'alon rightly expressed Israels disappointment with Obama's efforts to prevent Iranian nuclearization.  Austere Challenge 12” was designed to improve defense systems and cooperation between the United States and Israeli forces and was to include 9,000 US troops.

This latest show of weakness by the Obama administration follows Obama blaming Israel for the recent assassination of the Iranian nuclear scientist.  The impuissant American President has gone out of his way to place the blame for covert actions inside Iran squarely on the Israeli Mossad and has exposed Obama's animosity towards the Israeli leadership in the process.  President Barack Obama has sought to distance the US/Israeli historical relationship since his election in  2008 in an effort to appease Arabs.

In a feeble effort to rationalize the canceling of the Austere Challenge war-games, the Obama administration has stated it was canceled because of "budgetary constraints."  When has this President ever canceled anything because of budgetary constraints?  The United Kingdom and France has once again taken the lead role in confronting our common enemy, while Obama continues to "lead from behind."  The Persians see this gap in leadership and this gap will only embolden the Iranians to take offensive actions they might not consider if the world had a strong American President....a strong American President that backs Israel.    

Sphere: Related Content

New Hampshire election workers allow "dead" people to vote

The Daily Caller posted a video today that shows how easy it is to commit voter fraud if one so desired.  Conservative activist and film maker James O'Keefe investigated how simple it was to actually obtain a ballot by using the name of a dead person in the "Live Free or Die" state.  If you are a voter in New Hampshire, you are NOT required to show an ID to prove who you are when you vote.  As of September 2011, only thirty US states require some form of ID to vote, which provides many opportunities for voter fraud.

Attorney General Eric Holder and other Liberals claim voter ID laws are forms of "racism" and are enacted only to prevent black Americans from voting.  The Department of Justice, led by Eric Holder, has launched an all-out Jihad on states that have enacted voter ID laws.  In setting a precedent, the United States Supreme Court has upheld (2008) Indiana's voter ID law, which requires voters to present a valid government issued ID to cast a ballot.  Yet, the New Black Panther sympathizing Eric Holder has blocked South Carolina's voter ID law and will no doubt go after other states that enact such laws.

Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman-Shultz (AKA Baghdad Bob) has accused Republicans of "wanting to literally drag us back to Jim Crow laws."  As a side note, it was the Democratic Party that imposed racist Jim Crow Laws, but nevertheless the Liberals will do or say anything they can to prevent sensible voter ID laws.  The Left has used voter fraud to turn many close elections over the years and in many ways it's the only way they can get elected.  When ACORN was exposed for the frauds they are, the Obamanistas took a direct hit in their voter fraud efforts and voter ID laws pose yet another challenge to those efforts.  In the words of the Daily Caller, the reality is Eric Holder's actions are not focused on protecting voting rights. They are instead intended to make sure that Barack Obama wins re-election.     

Hats off to James O'Keefe and the Daily Caller for exposing this glaring weak link in our voting laws.  

     


                    

Sphere: Related Content